China Travel Services Group - winning tour packages Nexus HolidaysOfficial State Tourism Site
China Travel Tour Packages

Chinese Laws and Regulations Home

 
How to Complement Deficiency of A Contract
Deficiency of a contract refers to a case that a contract should prescribe some matters but has no such prescription.

Causes of such phenomena mainly includes following three:
1.Parties of a contract do not have negotiation concerning unessential factors;

2.Although they have negotiated on such unessential factors, parties have not reach agreement on it and thus agreed on settling it in the future;

3.Some clauses of a contract are invalid due to their breaching compulsory provisions or public interests.

It is not often the case that deficiency of a contract shall be complemented. Only when such clauses are unessential can they be complemented. A contract shall be invalid when it lacks essential clauses.

Clauses prescribed by Article 12 of the Contract Law of the PRC are different from those prescribed by Article 12 of the Economic Law of the PRC. They are demonstration clauses or suggestive clauses. It is often the case that a contract will be effective when it lacks of some clauses prescribed by Article 12 of the Contract Law. However, ¡°name or title and domicile of parties¡± and ¡°subject-matter of contract¡± prescribed by this Article are essential clauses. A contract will be invalid without them.

When clauses lacked are unessential factors, they shall be complemented. Firstly, provisions prescribed by Article 61 of the Contract Law, that is complementing through negotiation of both parties shall be applied. Nevertheless, negotiation is not normal since complement of deficiencies of a contract will give benefit to one party and damage to the other.

When parties cannot reach agreement, those deficient clauses shall be complemented according to relevant provisions of the contract (Article 61 of the Contract Law). It is a fundamental requirement of gives a holistic interpretation of the contract. Reasons of complement deficient clauses through holistic interpretation principle are as following,
1.After negotiation and recognition of both parties, clauses of a contract shall be treated equally as a whole;

2.Since language used to express and convey contracting intent of both parties is organized in the whole content of the contract, but not separate verbal arrangement without any connection, deficient clauses can be found out in such organized arrangement.

When deficient clauses cannot be complemented by holistic interpretation, it shall be complemented by business custom (Article 61 of the Contract Law). Business custom here refers to method of work, means or regulations that have been popularly recognized, accepted and abided by in some area, trade or some kind of economic circulation relationship. Secondly, such business custom shall be legal. Those breaching compulsory provisions are invalid and thus cannot be used to complement deficient clauses. Thirdly, both parties shall know such business custom. When one party only knows it, it shall not be applicable. When both parties know it, it shall have priority over arbitrary norm. Fourthly, both parties shall not expressly exclude such business custom.

According provisions of the Contract Law, when deficient clauses cannot be complemented through above methods, it shall be complemented according to provision of Article 62 as following,
1.When a contract lacks of quality control clause, it shall be complemented according to national standard and trade standard. Then, when it still has no such standards, it shall be complemented according to usual standard or specific standard in conformity with purpose of the contract.

2.When a contract lacks of clauses concerning price or reward, it shall be complemented according to market price of place of performance of the contract when it was being concluded. Moreover, it shall be complemented according to price fixed or directed by the Government when it is legally required.

3.When a contract lacks of clauses concerning performing place, it can be complemented differently in different situations. As to delivery of money, performing place shall be location of accepting party. As to delivery of real estate, performing place shall be lotus of the real estate. Performing place shall be location of obligor is the performing place in other circumstances. However, there is a special provision in contract of sale. When subject matter is in need of conveyance, vendor shall deliver it to the first carrier. When it shall not be conveyed and both parties know location of the subject matter when concluding contract, this location shall be place of delivery. On the contrary, place of business of the vendor when concluding the contract shall be the place of delivery (Article 141 of the Contract Law).

4.When a contract lacks of clauses concerning deadline for performance, it shall be the expiration of readiness time pointed by any party.

5.When a contract lacks of clauses concerning means of performance, it shall be complemented according to purpose of the contract.

6.When a contract lacks of clauses concerning which party shall bear performing cost, obligor shall shoulder it.

In some circumstances, deficiency of a contract yet cannot be complemented according to above rules. For example, Party A and Party B signed a contract of sale with simple clauses as following; ¡° Party sold an old color TV to Party B and ensured it had image and sound. Its purchase price is 150 RMB.¡± When examining this TV, Party B found that it had absolutely lost functions ensured by Party A and claimed rights to Party A. Then, there was a dispute occurring. Obviously, this contract lacks clauses concerning remedies. It cannot be complemented according to provisions of Article 61 and Article 62 of the Contract Law and thus shall look for other provisions.

Then, Article 111 and Article 148 can be used as basis for complement to ascertain that Party A shall repair, return the TV or reduce purchase price. Remedies prescribed in Article 111 have no enforced applying order. Observant party can make free choice, which certainly shall be reasonable. When Party A has capability to repair the TV, Party B¡¯s choosing repair, retur (cancellation of contract) or even reducing purchasing price will be reasonable. However, it is illegal when Party B claims for repair while Party A does not have such capability.

In individual cases, it will not accord with benefits of parties and lead to appropriate legal result when complementing deficiency of a contract according to arbitrary norm. Then, it shall be complemented by complementary contract interpretation. Complementary interpretation refers to interpretation of objective content of a contract fill up deficiency of the contract. What¡¯s being interpreted is entirety of the contract concluded by parties. In other words, complementary interpretation is not seek for original idea of parties (actual intention), but hypothetical intention of parties, which is reasonable intention or accepted clauses of a contract in normal business of both parties. Hypothetical intention of parties, which is a normative criterion being recognized according to good faith doctrine and business tradition, takes value judgment and benefit evaluation of parties towards the contract as its focus of attention for realizing fair and efficiency. In practice, judges or arbitrator complement deficiency of a contract according to above rules and methods and concrete details of the case.

It is certain that different people will have different judgment towards fair, which makes, in individual cases, fair judgment made by judge or arbitrator is different from that of both parties. Compared with clauses complemented according to fairness ideas of parties, those complemented according to fairness ideas of judges are possibly less efficient because parties are usually economic men whose most important object is to earn profit as much as they can. It will give consideration both fair and efficiency when they dealing in accordance with fairness ideas. However, both judge and arbitrator are legal men, but not necessarily economic men. Then, it is possible that clauses complemented by them cannot bring best economic efficiency. It shall be paid attention when complementing deficiency of a contract.